Lozada v. City and County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLINE, P. J.
Introduction
Is a public safety officer, when seeking actual damages and civil penalties in addition to declaratory and injunctive relief for alleged violations of the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (Gov. Code, § 3300 et seq. (POBRA)) required to present a claim to the public entity employer pursuant to the “Government Claims Act” (Gov. Code, § 900 et seq.)? We shall conclude that in this case, where the claims for money and damages pursued by the officer were more than “incidental” to the extraordinary relief sought, the answer is yes.
Police Officer…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Burden v. SnowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Baggett v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Parthemore v. ColCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Robinson v. Alameda CountyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Canova v. Trustees of Imperial Irrigation District Employee Pension PlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Rony v. CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- California Correctional Peace Officers Assn. v. VirgaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.