Legal Opinion

Blevens v. Kitchin Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 10, 1934PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScheNCK, J.

The defendant contends that the action as alleged in the complaint is a local action, and that Graham County, in which the land referred to in the complaint is situated, is the proper venue. The plaintiff contends that the action as alleged in the complaint is a transitory action, and that Yancey County, where it was instituted, is a proper venue. The defendant in its brief says, and correctly so, that “the form of action stated in the complaint determines this appeal”; and, since the “complaint determines this appeal,” we are precluded from considering the allegation in the petition for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brady v. . BradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Cedar Works v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Andrews v. BrutonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Thompson v. HorrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Howle v. Twin States Express, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. McCrary Stone Service, Inc. v. LyallsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Powell v. Eastern Carolina Regional Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API