Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Hood
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.
Tbe defendant is statutory receiver of tbe Bank of Black Mountain and as such is subject to tbe provisions of Article thirteen, Chapter fifty-five, relating to receivers, when not inconsistent with the provisions of G. S., 53-20. G. S., 53-22. This Court, in Biggs v. Bowen, 170 N. C., 34, 86 S. E., 692, held that Revisal, 424 (now G. S., 1-82), governed the venue of an action brought by the receiver of a corporation. The Court said: “The authorities seem to be uniform that in determining the residence of fiduciaries for the purpose of venue or citizenship, the personal residence of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Causey v. . MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Craven v. . MungerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Curlee v. National Bank of FayettevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Howard v. . HinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Lawson Ex Rel. Stallings v. LangleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Thompson v. HorrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Stokes v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
- Biggs v. . BowenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. FinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Lowther v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.