Legal Opinion
People v. Louis
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 27, 2011PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, his resentencing to a term including the statutorily-required period of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process, since he had not yet completed his originally-imposed sentence of imprisonment at the time he was resentenced (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621, 630-632 [2011]; People v Dawkins, 87 AD3d 550 [2011]; People v Harris, 86 AD3d 543 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 859 [2011]; People v Guillen, 85 AD3d 1201 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 859 [2011]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. LingleNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. DawkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People of State of New York v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. GuillenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. DolberryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. JiggettsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. QuinonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. JohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.