Legal Opinion

Mathers v. Roxy Auto Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1954No. Appeal, No. 289PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Chidsey,

Plaintiff, David Mathers, brought suit in assumpsit against the defendant corporation, Roxy Auto Company, to recover damages for breach of an alleged oral agreement by the defendant to purchase liability insurance, which agreement plaintiff claims was entered into about two days prior to the execution of a writ*641ten bailment lease covering the purchase by plaintiff of an automobile. About three weeks after the execution of and during the term of the bailment lease, a pedestrian was struck and injured by the automobile while being operated by the plaintiff. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Speier v. MichelsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. O'Brien v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Grubb v. RockeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Jordan v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of CanadaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Midkiff v. Castle & Cooke, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Rose v. Food Fair Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Sokoloff v. StrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Lefkowitz v. Hummel Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Fisher v. Congregation B'nai YitzhokSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API