Legal Opinion

Speier v. Michelson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 6, 1931No. Appeal, 128PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

This is an action on a promissory note. The affidavit of defense admitted its execution and delivery, but averred a parol understanding subjecting payment of the instrument to certain conditions. The affidavit stated that the parties were joint owners of a piece of real estate in Philadelphia, subject to a mortgage, and that appellant, being obligated to pay one-half, was unable to raise the necessary funds and borrowed the amount from his coowner, giving therefor the note in suit. It was also averred that the note was to be paid out of the proceeds to be…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Gandy v. WeckerlySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  3. Martin & Monroe v. BerensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  4. Irvin v. Irvin, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Clearfield County1891
  5. Union Storage Co. ex rel. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. SpeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Aetna Business Credit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  2. Bardwell v. the Willis CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Nicolella v. PalmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. United Refining Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. LeDonne v. KesslerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API