Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1951No. Appeal, 236PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Chief Justice Deew,

In this action in assumpsit we are concerned with an alleged oral agreement between Eugene Jordan, plaintiff, and The Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada., defendant. Plaintiff claims that this agreement was entered into prior to his submitting in writing his resignation as manager of defendant’s Philadelphia office. The learned court below entered a nonsuit on the ground that the parol evidence rule prevented proof of the alleged oral contract. From an order refusing to remove the nonsuit, plaintiff brought this appeal.

On July 6, 1923, plaintiff entered into…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. O'Brien v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Cridge's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Garrison v. SalkindSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Sunseri v. SunseriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. RazumicSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Storm v. GoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. F. W. Wise Co. v. Beech Creek RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Highland Tank & Manufacturing Co. v. DuerrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Keleher v. LaSALLE COLLEGE.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API