Legal Opinion
Newblock v. Bowles
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 5, 1935No. 24932PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBusby, J.
This action involves the proper interpretation of certain provisions of the city charter of the city of Tulsa, Okla., and of ordinance No. 3988 of the city of Tulsa relative to the rights and authority of the board of commissioners of the city of Tulsa and the individual members thereof under such charter and ordinance.
The defendant in error, Anderson P. Bowies, was duly elected police and fire commissioner of the city of Tulsa, Okla., and, as such, by the provisions of the city charter of Tulsa, there was placed under his special charge the enforcement of all police regulations of the city.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McCain v. State Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- State v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1914
- Foot v. Town of WatongaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Cornell v. McAlisterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- City Nat. Bank of Fort Smith v. Incorporated Town of KiowaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State ex rel. Trent v. SimsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
- Greenberg v. WolfbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- State v. LOUISIANA RIVERBOAT GAMING COM'N & HORSESHOE ENTERT.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
- Filson v. Windsor Court HotelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
- Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.