Legal Opinion

Cornell v. McAlister

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 12, 1926No. 17788PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMason, J.

At the primary election, held August S, 1926, John Rogers was a candidate for the nomination of the Democratic party for the office of State Examiner and Inspector. At said election, Rogers received more votes than any other candidate for said nomination and, thereupon, he was declared, by the State Election Board, to be’ the nominee and candidate of the Democratic party for said office at the state election to be held on the 2d of November, 1926, and said board issued and delivered its certificate of nomination to him.

Thereafter, on September 4, 1926, the plaintiff in error, I-I. Nelson…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jacob Ruppert v. CaffeySupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Coyle v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. State Ex Rel. Short v. RiedellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Gerberding v. MunroWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Gerberding v. MunroWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Board of Comr's v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  4. Reale v. Board of Real Estate AppraisersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  5. Dowell v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API