Marco Island Partners v. Oak Development Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BUA, District Judge.
Defendants in this case have subpoenaed one of plaintiffs’ attorneys for the purpose of taking his deposition. Plaintiffs have moved to quash this deposition subpoena. For the reasons stated herein, this court grants plaintiffs’ motion, with leave to reinstate the deposition subpoena upon a showing that the requested deposition would not be duplicative.
FACTS
On December 30, 1986, after several days of negotiation, plaintiffs agreed to purchase a hotel in Marco Island, Florida from defendant G.S. of Marco. That same day, plaintiffs also entered into an agreement with…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Shelton v. American Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Hunt International Resources Corp. v. BinsteinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
- Walker v. United Parcel ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Cooper v. Welch Foods, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1984
- Manufacturing Systems, Inc. of Milwaukee v. Computer Technology, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1983
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kaiser v. Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1994
- Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox, P.L.L.C. v. Eastman Kodak CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Advance Systems, Inc. v. APV Baker PMC, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1989
- Harriston v. Chicago Tribune Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- Kelling v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.