Legal Opinion

Harriston v. Chicago Tribune Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 27, 1990No. 87 C 8875PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge.

Before the court is the motion of defendant, Chicago Tribune Company (“Tribune”), for a protective order, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c), to prohibit the deposition of its attorney, John W. Powers. For the following reasons, the court grants the motion.

On October 16, 1987, Octavia 0. Harriston filed this suit, alleging racial discrimination in her termination from employment by the Tribune. Currently before the court is plaintiff’s fourth amended complaint.

As previously noted by the court, the proceedings in this action have been protracted and, to say the least,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shelton v. American Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  2. Advance Systems, Inc. v. APV Baker PMC, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1989
  3. Marco Island Partners v. Oak Development Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Williams v. City of DallasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1998
  2. Blanchard v. EdgeMark Financial Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
  3. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pennsylvania v. KriegerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1995
  4. Kelling v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1994
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. BuntrockDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API