Legal Opinion

Hunt International Resources Corp. v. Binstein

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 28, 1983No. 83 C 4860PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

The law firms of Cotton, Watt, Jones, King & Bowlus; Sachnoff, Weaver & Rubenstein, Ltd.; and Sperling, Slater & Spitz, P.C. have moved this Court for an order quashing a deposition subpoena directed to John M. Bowlus.1 These firms represent approximately 2,400 plaintiffs in actions entitled Jean and Patricia Adair, et a1. v. Hunt International Resources Corp., et al., Case No. 79 C 4206 (“Adair”) and Glennys Aaland, et al. v. Hunt International Resources Corp., et al., Case No. 80 C 5317 (“Aaland”), currently pending in the Northern District…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Donaldson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Reisman v. CaplinSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. George v. H. KleifgenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  5. Oliver B. Cannon & Son, Inc. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Shelton v. American Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  2. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1989
  3. N.F.A. Corp. v. Riverview Narrow Fabrics, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1987
  4. Evans v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
  5. Parsons Ex Rel. Parsons v. Allstate Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API