Legal Opinion

Walker v. United Parcel Services

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 23, 1980No. Civ. A. Nos. 76-2732, 78-3327PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SHAPIRO, District Judge.

Plaintiffs seek to depose an attorney in the law firm representing the defendant United Parcel Service (“UPS”), to consider whether or not to call him as their witness in support of plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. Plaintiffs assert the need to preliminarily restrain defendants UPS and Local No. 724, International Association of Machinists (“Local No. 724”), from retaliating against them and witnesses who will support their claim for relief from alleged racial discrimination in violation, inter alia, of Title VII of the Civil Rights…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Jamison v. Miracle Mile Rambler, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  4. Scovill Manufacturing Co. v. Sunbeam Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1973
  5. J. D. Pflaumer, Inc. v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Shelton v. American Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  2. Ades v. ZalmanSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1984
  3. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1989
  4. N.F.A. Corp. v. Riverview Narrow Fabrics, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1987
  5. Doubleday v. RuhDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API