Legal Opinion
Kelling v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 7, 1994No. 93-1319-FGTPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*171ORDER
REID, United States Magistrate Judge.
On December 27, 1993, defendant Bridge-stone/Firestone, Inc. filed a motion to compel the deposition of John Hash, plaintiff’s counsel (Doc. 44). A response was filed on January 6, 1994 (Doc. 46). A reply was filed on January 14, 1994 (Doc. 48).
Defendant has filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff’s counsel, and the deposition is sought in relation to that motion. An attorney, even an attorney for a party to the suit, is subject to being deposed. 8 Wright and Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2102 at 369 (1970). However, the taking of a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Shelton v. American Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. DaccarettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1989
- N.F.A. Corp. v. Riverview Narrow Fabrics, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1987
- Doubleday v. RuhDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re Linerboard Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Simmons Foods, Inc. v. WillisDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- United Phosphorus, Ltd. v. Midland Fumigant, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
- D.L. v. Unified School District 497District Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- Dunkin' Donuts, Inc. v. Mandorico, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.