Legal Opinion

Harper v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1961PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

There is no issue of fact raised by the pleadings and the affidavits. The question of law to be decided is whether or not the insurance liability policy issued by the defendant covered Norton as an additional insured at the time of the accident.

The defendant issued an automobile liability policy on the 1951 Cadillac used for business and pleasure and owned *502by the Lincoln Manufacturing Company, which company was referred to as a corporation in the affidavits but as a partnership in the trial court’s opinion. Lincoln Manufacturing Company was located in Chicago, Illinois. Henry A. Smith,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Drewek v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Prisuda v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Schimke v. Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. of HermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Cocos v. American Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  5. Maurer v. FesingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. WilcoxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Schneck v. Mutual Service Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Krebsbach v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Bailey Ex Rel. First National Bank of Catawba County, Inc. v. General Insurance Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Larry Gillen v. Globe Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API