Legal Opinion
Bopp v. Brames
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 30, 1999No. 84A01-9807-CV-278PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge
This case is once again before us on appeal after remand to the trial court. Appellants-plaintiffs and counter defendants James Bopp, Jr., and Barry A. Bostrom [collectively, Bopp], appeal the trial court’s award of $67,614.73 in favor of appellees-defendants and counter claimants, Arnold H. Brames, Eric M. Abel, Rhonda D. Oldham, and the partnership of Brames & Oldham [collectively, Brames].
Specifically, Bopp contends that the decision is erroneous because: (1) the trial court did not pro rate the cost of Bopp’s gross general overhead expenses in calculating the amount…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Howard Dodge & Sons, Inc. v. FinnIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc. v. S.E. Lab Group, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Hammes v. FrankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Brane v. RothIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Western Ohio Pizza, Inc. v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Demming v. UnderwoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Whited v. WhitedIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Thor Electric, Inc. v. Oberle & Associates, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Johnson v. EldridgeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- General Motors Corp. v. SheetsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.