Legal Opinion

Brane v. Roth

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 20, 1992No. 52A02-9102-CV-50PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RATLIFF, Chief Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Paul H. Brane, Kenneth Richison, Ralph Dawes, and John Thompson (collectively “directors”) appeal the award of $424,-038.89 plus interest for Porter Roth, et al. (collectively “shareholders”), in an action against them as directors of the LaFon-taine Grain Co-op (“Co-op”). We affirm.

ISSUES

We restate the issues as:

1. Did the trial court err in denying the directors’ motion for dismissal for lack of evidence pursuant to Ind. Trial Rule 41(B)?

2. Did the court apply an improper standard of care to the directors?

3. Did the court err in admitting Exhibits…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. W & W Equipment Co., Inc. v. MinkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Comfax Corp. v. North American Van Lines, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. State Ex Rel. Indiana State Board of Dental Examiners v. JuddIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Coddington v. CanadayIndiana Supreme Court · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Cinerama, Inc. v. Technicolor, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1994
  2. Boland v. EngleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  3. In Re the Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of E.T.Indiana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc. v. S.E. Lab Group, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Turner v. Board of Aviation CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API