Legal Opinion

Whited v. Whited

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 2007No. 34S02-0701-CV-8PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

The parties before us have spent considerable time and money litigating the amount of child support due from the 1990's. The trial court gave the obligor/fa-ther both too much and not enough. It wrongly permitted him a retroactive modification of support for a period in which he should have fully paid an "order in gross" for three children, but it also ordered him to pay support after two children were emancipated and the third had come to live with him, in what was a de facto change of custody.

Facts and Procedural History

Kenneth R. Whited and Kathy L. Holland married…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Corbridge v. CorbridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Straub v. B.M.T. Ex Rel. ToddIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Zirkle v. ZirkleIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Bopp v. BramesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Isler v. IslerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Wickens v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. Margaret Kosarko v. William A. Padula, Administrator of the Estate of Daniel L. HerndoblerIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Saalfrank v. SaalfrankIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Marriage of Becker v. BeckerIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. McGuire v. McGuireIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API