Legal Opinion

Hammes v. Frank

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1991No. 41A01-9010-CV-406PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, Judge.

This appeal arises from the dissolution of an Indianapolis law partnership. Plaintiff-appellants Joseph Hammes and Henry Dein appeal as inadequate a judgment rendered in their favor following an accounting. They raise four issues on appeal, restated as:

I. Whether the trial court erred in its calculation of Frank's overhead.

II. Whether the trial court erred in its treatment of Magnuson's forfeited share.

III. Whether the trial court erred in its distribution of certain class action attorney fees.

IV. Whether the trial court erred in refusing to award prejudgment interest on certain…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Indiana Industries, Inc. v. Wedge Products, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Jewel v. BoxerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Nehi Beverage Co., Inc. v. PetriIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Wickens v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. G & N AIRCRAFT, INC. v. BoehmIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc. v. S.E. Lab Group, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Bopp v. BramesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Brane v. RothIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API