Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc. v. S.E. Lab Group, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARTEAU, Judge.
Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc. (HSD) brings this appeal alleging that the trial court committed error in calculating prejudgment interest. S.E. Lab Group, Inc. (S.E. Lab) cross-appeals, alleging the trial court erred by excluding the testimony of its expert witness. We heard oral argument on December 6, 1994.
FACTS
HSD breeds rats and mice in various strains that it sells to researchers for use in laboratory testing. 1 The market price of the animals within each strain depends upon factors such as sex, size and age of the animals.
HSD uses an automatic watering system to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Simmons, Inc., a Corporation v. Pinkerton's, Inc., a Corporation and National Surety Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Noblesville Casting Division of TRW, Inc. v. PrinceIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
- New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. RoperIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- American United Life Insurance Company v. PeffleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
- Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Lachenman v. SticeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Hannan v. Pest Control Services, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Raybestos Products Company, a Delaware Corporation v. Gilbert W. Younger, an Individual, and Transgo, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Turner v. Board of Aviation CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Emergency Physicians of Indianapolis v. PettitIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.