Legal Opinion

Herrington v. State Ex Rel. Office of the State Engineer

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 2006No. 28,628PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOSSON, Chief Justice.

{1} The Herringtons, long time irrigators in the Rio de Arenas Valley in southwestern New Mexico, applied to the New Mexico State Engineer for a supplemental well. The Herringtons claimed their surface right had been diminished by groundwater wells in the basin, having a priority date junior to the surface right of the Herringtons. Applying the principles of fairness that underscore the doctrine in Templeton v. Pecos Valley Artesian Conservancy District, 65 N.M. 59, 332 P.2d 465 (1958), the Herringtons sought to supplement their surface water rights with a well.

{2}…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Trujillo v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State Ex Rel. Martinez v. City of Las VegasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Yeo v. TweedyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hydro Resources Corp. v. GrayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Bounds v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Miller v. Bank of AmericaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Tri-State Generation & Transmission Ass'n v. D'AntonioNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Carangelo v. Albuquerque-Bernalillo Cnty. Water Util. Auth.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API