Legal Opinion

Trujillo v. City of Albuquerque

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1998No. 18296, 19118PublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BACA, Justice.

{1} These consolidated appeals involve separate tort claims brought against the City of Albuquerque (City) pursuant to the New Mexico Tort Claims Act (TCA), NMSA 1978, § 41-4-1 to 4-27 (1976, as amended through 1996). Plaintiffs from both cases challenged the constitutionality of the damages limitation in Section 41-4-19(A) of the TCA, arguing that the cap violates their rights of equal protection under the New Mexico and United States Constitutions.

{2} In considering the constitutionality of the cap, it first is necessary to determine the applicable analysis for this…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. Herrera Ex Rel. Estate of Ruiz v. Quality PontiacNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Ocana v. American Furniture Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
  3. New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Quynh Truong v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Allsup's Convenience Stores, Inc. v. North River InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API