Legal Opinion
Tri-State Generation & Transmission Ass'n v. D'Antonio
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided October 28, 2010No. 27,802PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
{1} We are presented in this case with a challenge to the validity of 19.25.13.27 NMAC (12/30/2004) and 19.25.13.30 NMAC (12/30/2004) of the Active Water Resource Management (AWRM) Regulations promulgated by the State Engineer. The dispute centers on aspects of the regulations that contemplate the administration of water rights through the determination and enforcement of priority. The district court overturned portions of the two regulations at issue because it found that they impermissibly expanded the scope of the State Engineer’s statutory authority and violated…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Brandenburg v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Sims v. SimsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- New Mexico Industrial Energy Consumers v. New Mexico Public Regulation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- TULAROSA v. State EngineerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tri-State Generation & Transmission. Ass'n. v. D'AntonioNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
- First Baptist Church of Roswell v. Yates Petroleum Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- State of N.M. ex rel. OSE v. Elephant Butte Irrigation Dist.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- First Baptist Church v. Yates Petroleum Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- Chavez v. State Workers' Compensation Admin.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.