Legal Opinion
Yeo v. Tweedy
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided April 12, 1929No. Nos. 3408, 3420PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WATSON, J.
John Tweedy appeals from a decree enjoining him (at the suit of the state engineer) from sinking a well upon land owned by him for the purpose of tapping underlying artesian waters without having'first obtained a license from the state engineer. The state engineer appeals from a decree denying an injunction against Oscar Pearson and another to enjoin them from doing the same act. The two appeals have been heard, and will be decided together. Involving the interpretation and validity of chapter 182, Laws of 1927, far-reaching results attend their decision. As…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kansas v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Beals ex rel. Walker v. AresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1919
- City of San Bernardino v. City of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. Southwest Cotton Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
- State Ex Rel. Bliss v. DorityNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
- State Ex Rel. Martinez v. City of Las VegasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
- State Ex Rel. State Game Commission v. Red River Valley Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
- City of Albuquerque v. ReynoldsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.