Fink v. DeClassis
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
BUA, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Jacob J. Fink and Peterson Corporation have moved to dismiss several counts of defendants’ counterclaim pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Specifically, plaintiffs contend that Counts I, III, IV, V, IX, X, and XI should be dismissed as to both Fink and Peterson, while Counts VI and VIII should be dismissed as to Fink only. Pursuant Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f), plaintiffs have also moved to strike Counts IV and VIII. For the reasons stated herein, plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss is granted with respect to Counts I, III, IV, V, IX, X, and XI, and denied with…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Ingersoll v. KleinIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
- Bushkin Associates, Inc. v. Raytheon Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Soules v. General Motors Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Rich Products Corp. v. Kemutec, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1999
- Dethmers Manufacturing Co. v. Automatic Equipment Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1998
- Morgan Publications, Inc. v. Squire Publishers, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Hoopla Sports & Entertainment, Inc. v. Nike, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- Duncan v. Nissan N. Am., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.