Legal Opinion
Glatt v. G. C. Murphy Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided November 6, 1958No. Civ. A. No. 9278PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
R. DORSEY WATKINS, District Judge.
Nature of the Action.
This is an action for infringement of Patent No. 2,704,730, issued to plaintiff on March 22, 1955, on an application filed on August 14, 1953, relating to “Semi-Porous Coated Cloth and Articles Made Therefrom.” This was a continuation-in-part of an application filed by plaintiff on August 6, 1952, for “Semi-Porous Coated Cloth and Ironing Pad Covers Therefrom.” The nominal defendant is G. C. Murphy Corporation, but the suit was admittedly defended by Mapeo Corporation, successor to Modern-age Aluminum Products Company, the manufacturer of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Baker-Cammack Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Davis Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
- Carl Otto v. Koppers Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Wheeling Steel Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
- Lincoln Stores, Inc. v. Nashua Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States Pipe & Foundry Co. v. James B. Clow & Sons, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1962
- Buildex Inc. v. Kason Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1987
- Herbert Glatt, T/a Magla Products v. G. C. Murphy CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
- Deering, Milliken & Co., Inc. v. Temp-Resisto CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960