Legal Opinion

Herbert Glatt, T/a Magla Products v. G. C. Murphy Company

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 29, 1959No. 7880_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNSWORTH, Circuit Judge.

The District Court 1 held invalid claims 2 and 4 of Glatts’ Patent No. 2,704,730, issued March 22, 1955, covering “Semi-Porous Coated Cloth and Articles Made Therefrom.” 2 We agree that those claims are invalid for lack of invention.

In 1948 and 1949, Glatt was a young man with a small mercantile business. Among other things, he sold ironing board covers, and he became acquainted with the deficiencies of those he sold. He undertook to find a better, more salable, cover, particularly one with a heat resistant coating.

The domestic ironing board must be padded, usually…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Rosemary Mfg. Co. v. Halifax Cotton Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1919
  3. Glatt v. G. C. Murphy Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1958

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Deering, Milliken & Co. v. Temp-Resisto Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  2. Buildex Inc. v. Kason Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1987
  3. Deering, Milliken & Co., Inc. v. Temp-Resisto CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API