Legal Opinion
Interstate Transit, Inc. v. City of Detroit
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 6, 1931No. 5493PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff brought its bill in the court below seeking an injunction to restrain the enforcement of an ordinance of the city of Detroit which required interstate bus operators to procure a city license before being ■permitted to operate upon the public streets. Some of the ordinance provisions are quite clearly regulatory, in character, such as the routing of buses, brake equipment, mechani*43cal requirements, registration of drivers, ete. These are not seriously objected to, but it is claimed by the plaintiff that other provisions, requiring (1) the filing of a policy…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Meccano, Ltd. v. John Wanamaker, NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Eagle Glass & Manufacturing Co. v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Goldwyn Pictures Corp. v. GoldwynCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- City of Owensboro v. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. Tennessee Electric Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
- In Re Michigan Brewing Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1938
- Set-O-Type Co. v. American Multigraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
- City of Anchorage v. BerryDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1956
- Pactiv Corp. v. ChesterDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.