Pactiv Corp. v. Chester

AMENDED 1 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING THE MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON CO UNTSII AND III

FEIKENS, District Judge.

Previously, I found I have jurisdiction to hear Plaintiffs claims that M.C.L. §§ 324.20114(l)(h) and 324.20137(1) violate its constitutional due process rights, to the extent that the statutes require Pactiv Corp. (Pactiv) to undertake planning and penalize the failure to properly plan without first providing notice and an opportunity to be heard. 2 Pactiv Corp. v. Chester, 419 F.Supp.2d 956 (E.D.Mich.2006). I also declined to take jurisdiction over the state law claim. Id.…