Legal Opinion
Goldwyn Pictures Corp. v. Goldwyn
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 7, 1924No. 218PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). This is a suit for the infringement of a trade-mark. The plaintiff has sought and obtained an injunction pendente lite restraining the defendant from using the name “Goldwyn” on. any moving picture films, advertisements, or other displays to be shown to the public, unless in all cases it be followed by the words “not now connected with Goldwyn Pictures.” And it is added that s-Uch suffix is “to be in as large and of as prominent type and of the same color as the word ‘Goldwyn,’ and tcvbe so-spaced and spread as to be as noticeable as that word.”…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brown Chemical Co. v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Meccano, Ltd. v. John Wanamaker, NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Clark v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Buffington v. HarveySupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Russia Cement Co. v. LePageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Brooks Bros. v. Brooks Clothing of California, Ltd.District Court, S.D. California · 1945
- Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1925
- Hazel Bishop, Inc. v. Perfemme, Inc. And Hazel BishopCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Johnston v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- Huber Baking Co. v. Stroehmann Bros. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.