Legal Opinion
City of Anchorage v. Berry
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided May 11, 1956No. Civ. No. A-9414PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCARREY, District Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment'in the Magistrate’s Court of the City of Anchorage in which the appellant was found guilty of “the offense of soliciting in residential area in violation of Ordinance No. Chap. 5 (Section No. 115.1).” A fine of $10.00 was imposed and the same suspended.
Section 115.1 of Chapter 5 of the Anchorage General Code of the City of Anchorage, Alaska, provides as follows:
“Soliciting in residential area. No solicitor, peddler, hawker, itinerant merchant, transient vendor of merchandise, or other person shall go in and upon private residences in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Breard v. AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- State Ex Rel. Hewlett v. WomachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
- State v. CantwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc. v. LewisohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Tate v. AkersDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1976
- WATCHTOWER BIBLE SOC. v. LewisohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1974