Legal Opinion
Set-O-Type Co. v. American Multigraph Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 5, 1932No. 5993PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HICKS, Circuit Judge.
Appeal, under section 129 of the Judicial Code, 28 U. S. C. § 227 (28 USCA § 227), from an order denying a preliminary injunction. The amended bill sought to enjoin appellee from engaging in certain alleged unfair trade practices. The gravamen of the bill is that appellant manufactured and sold under the name of “Set-O-Type,” a device for setting cold movable type in printing segments at typing speed; that it also manufactured type and other equipment for use in connection with the machine; that appellee, prior to the advent of Set-O-Type had manufactured and sold…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Prendergast v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Meccano, Ltd. v. John Wanamaker, NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- National Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Rice & Adams Corp. v. LathropSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- American Malting Co. v. KeitelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Garlock, Inc. v. United Seal Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Upjohn Company v. FinchDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1969
- Cincinnati Bengals, Inc. v. BergeyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1974
- Garlock, Inc. v. United Seal Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Mueller v. WolfingerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.