In re Application of Middletown Coke Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.
{¶ 1} This case comes before us as an appeal from an administrative order of the Power Siting Board. The siting board granted the Middletown Coke Company a certificate to build a “cogeneration station,” which is part of an integrated industrial facility that will produce both purified coal and electricity. The city of Monroe, which borders the project site, appeals from that order on four grounds, mainly relating to whether the siting board erred in refusing to exercise jurisdiction over portions of the facility used to generate electricity and also to produce coke.
{¶ 2} We agree with Monroe…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State ex rel. Purdy v. Clermont County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Constellation NewEnergy, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Ohio Edison Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Weiss v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- In re Application of Am. Transm. Sys., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Vossman v. AirNet Sys., Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- In re Application of Duke Energy Ohio, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
- In re Application of Middletown Coke Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010