Legal Opinion
Nichols v. Debritz
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 27, 1934No. 25016. Department OnePublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
The plaintiff, by this action, sought to foreclose a real estate mortgage. The defendant Jerome E. Page resisted the foreclosure, and by cross-complaint sought to have the “mortgage cancelled and his title to the property quieted.” The trial was to the court without a jury, and resulted in a judgment to the effect that the mortgage gave a superior right to that claimed by Page, and from this judgment Page appeals.
The facts essential to be stated are these: The property in question is lots 16 and 17, in block 2, of Reng-storff Addition to the city of Seattle, and is improved with a dwelling…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashford v. ReeseWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Dennis v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1898
- Smith v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- Field v. Copping, Agnew & ScalesWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Oliver v. McEachranWashington Supreme Court · 1928
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Peoples National Bank v. Birney's Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- OneWest Bank, FSB v. EricksonWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- Miebach v. ColasurdoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- Wiswall v. Tanner (In Re Tanner)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 1992
- Time Oil Co. v. PalmerWashington Supreme Court · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.