Legal Opinion

Oliver v. McEachran

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1928No. 21356. Department OnePublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

This is an action to establish an easement for a right of way, to recover possession, and for damages suffered by exclusion therefrom. From a judgment favorable to the plaintiffs, the defendants McEachran and wife have appealed.

It appears that, in 1917, defendants Schneider were the owners of lots nine (9) to twelve (12), inclusive, in block three (3), Eureka Addition to Tacoma. These lots were each 25 x 120 feet and, taken together, they made a tract of land fronting 100 feet on North 28th street, running thence back 120 feet to an alley, and bounded on the west by Puget Sound avenue.

Schneide…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ashford v. ReeseWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Dennis v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Van Buren v. TrumbullWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Forde v. LibbyWyoming Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Field v. Copping, Agnew & ScalesWashington Supreme Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cascade Security Bank v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. In Re the Dissolution & Disorganization of Horse Heaven Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Lawson v. HelmichWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  4. In Re Estate of VerbeekCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  5. State Ex Rel. Oatey Orchard Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1929

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API