Legal Opinion

Field v. Copping, Agnew & Scales

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1911No. 9741PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Lewis county, Rice, J., entered December SI, 1910, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action for rent.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

— This is an action for the recovery of rent. There was a judgment for the plaintiff. The defendants have appealed.

The following is an epitome of the facts found by the court: On the 15th day of January, 1909, Alex McEachern was the owner of the property upon which the suit for rent is based, and on that day executed, acknowledged, and delivered to Richards & Cunningham, a copartnership, a lease upon the same for three years from the 1st day of January, 1909, at the monthly rental of $30, payable in advance. The lease provides:

“And it is hereby agreed, that in case of default in any of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Webster v. NicholsIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Murray v. . HarwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Dennis v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Randol v. TatumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Porter v. MerrillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kane v. KlosWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Kanawha-Gauley Coal & Coke Co. v. SharpWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Wilson v. DanielsWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Farmers Bank & Trust Co. v. Palms Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1923
  5. Cohen v. ToddSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API