Legal Opinion

OneWest Bank, FSB v. Erickson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 2016No. 91283-1PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairhurst, J.

¶1 At its core, this case concerns the authority of an Idaho court to impact property in Washington and whether we must respect that court’s orders. This *48case arose through OneWest Bank FSB’s attempted foreclosure of Washington property based on a reverse mortgage that an Idaho court ordered through Bill McKee’s conservatorship proceedings. McKee’s daughter, Maureen M. Erickson, challenges the foreclosure, claiming the reverse mortgage is void because she was the actual owner of the property and the Idaho court had no jurisdiction to affect Washington property, among other claims. The trial…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Massie v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  5. Fall v. EastinSupreme Court of the United States · 1909

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bennett v. CIT Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2021
  2. Braxton Minerals III, LLC v. Robert Scott Bauer and Braxton Minerals II, LLCTexas Supreme Court · 2026
  3. Chan Healthcare Group v. Liberty Mutual Fire Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  4. Chan Healthcare Grp. v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Citimortgage v. Paul MoseleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API