Legal Opinion

Borglund v. World Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1957PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff, Andrew Borglund, and a cross-appeal by the defendant, World Insurance Company, from a judgment which the circuit court rendered after it had entered findings of fact and conclusions of law. The action that led to the double appeal was based upon a policy of disability benefit insurance issued by the defendant to the plaintiff March 10, 1948, and an accident with which the plaintiff met April 4,1952. As a result of the accident the plaintiff’s left leg was amputated above the knee, leaving only an eight-inch stub. Concisely stated, the complaint alleges that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moore v. Ætna Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Kinard v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n of Omaha, Neb.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1952
  3. Kangas v. Standard Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. Nelson v. Great Northern Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Bates v. Inter-Ocean Casualty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Shadbolt v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. George B. Wallace Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Finley v. Prudential Life & Casualty InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Chalmers v. OREGON AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API