Legal Opinion

Kinard v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n of Omaha, Neb.

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided December 9, 1952No. Civ. A. 562PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN E. MILLER, District Judge.

Formal findings of fact and conclusions of law, separately stated, have been filed herein.

The plaintiff, Kenneth Kinard, is seeking to recover from the defendant, Mutual Benefit Health and Accident Association of Omaha, Nebraska, benefits in the sum of $200 per month from November 29, 1950, to the date of the filing of the complaint, April 2, 1952. However, at the trial it was stipulated by the parties that if the plaintiff is entitled to recover, judgment should be entered for the amount found due at the date of the trial, October 29, 1952.

The suit is based…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Washington National Insurance v. CraddockTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Miller v. Illinois Bankers' Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  3. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  4. Travelers' Protective Assoc. of America v. StephensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  5. Bew v. Travelers' Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1921

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Great American Indem. Co. Of New York v. SaltzmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
  2. Hunter v. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Trans Ocean Van Service v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  4. Jimmy N. Looney, Clinton M. Hickman, Betty Cureton, Margaret Coon, Martha Cooper and R. T. Cooper v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  5. Borglund v. World InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1957

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API