George B. Wallace Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.
This is an action at law to recover upon a policy of automobile insurance issued by the defendant. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant and the plaintiff appeals.
There is no real dispute in the facts, nor is the question of the right of this plaintiff to maintain this action against the defendant in dispute.
The facts disclose that defendant issued to Dr. Lloyd P. Pratt, a resident of Roseburg, its contract of insurance, insuring Dr. Pratt’s Buick automobile, and that this policy was at all times (so far as this matter is concerned) in full force and effect. The Buick auto mobile had…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rossier v. Union Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1930
- Borglund v. World InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- Farmers Mut. Ins. Co. v. Un. Pac. Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1956
3Cited by49 opinions
- Shadbolt v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Federal Insurance Company v. PrestemonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Boedigheimer v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Central Security Mutual Insurance v. DePintoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- SCHOOL DIST. NO. 1, ETC. v. Mission Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.