Legal Opinion

Chalmers v. OREGON AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1972PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is an action on an insurance policy to recover for a loss of personal property by theft from premises contended by plaintiffs to be covered by the policy as a “temporary residence” then in “actual use” by them. The case was submitted for decision by the court without a jury on stipulated facts. Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant based upon a “finding of fact” that the theft occurred at a time when the premises were not in “actual use” by the insured as a “temporary residence.” We reverse.

The stipulated facts include the following:

“1. Plaintiff Raymond Chalmers was…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. May v. Chicago Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Williams v. Portland General Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Gowans v. Northwestern Pacific Indemnity Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Borglund v. World InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Jarrard v. Continental Casualty CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Harrell v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Shadbolt v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. SCHOOL DIST. NO. 1, ETC. v. Mission Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ClintonOregon Supreme Court · 1974

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API