Legal Opinion

Leposky v. Fenton

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 24, 2007No. AC 26869PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCHALLER, J.

The defendant Tammy Fenton1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a trial to the court, in favor of the plaintiffs, John A. Leposky and Diane Leposky, on the defendant’s counterclaim. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly expanded the plaintiffs’ easement through the doctrine of reasonable use. We conclude that the court improperly expanded the easement and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the trial court.2

*776The following facts are relevant to the defendant’s appeal. The parties own adjoining residential parcels in Shelton. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Russell v. RussellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  2. MacKin v. MacKinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Hagist v. WashburnConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  4. Mulla v. MaguireConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. Pender v. MatrangaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kwolek v. SwickardIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Thurlow v. HULTENConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  3. Fitch v. ForsthoefelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  4. Herasimovich v. Town of WallingfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  5. Williams v. Green Power Ventures, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API