Hagist v. Washburn

This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment ordering the defendants, their successors and assigns, to refrain from interfering with or obstructing the plaintiff’s1 use and enjoyment of a *84right-of-way over the defendants’ property. The defendants claim that the court erred (1) in holding that the plaintiff has a right to park vehicles on the easement and enjoining the defendants from doing the same, and (2) in refusing to define the exact boundaries of the easement. We find no error.

The complaint alleged that the plaintiff has owned and possessed certain property in Southington since…