Rothschild v. Village of Calumet Park
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kerher
Melville N. Rothschild, complainant, filed a bill against the Village of Calumet Park, defendant, for an accounting with respect to certain special assessments and for an injunction. After issue joined the cause was referred to a master to take testimony and report his conclusions of law and fact. The master filed his report, in which he recommended that a decree be entered requiring the defendant to pay complainant the amount due upon the bonds owned by complainant; that defendant be required to complete its records with reference to the collection' of instalments of special assessments so…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Conway v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Hewitt v. HayesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- The People v. SmallIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
- Howell v. MooresIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Warfield-Pratt-Howell Co. v. WilliamsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Sturdivant Bank v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
- State Ex Rel. Drainage District No. 8 v. DuncanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
- Rohwer v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Kerr Glass Manufacturing Corp. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.