Bigelow v. Brumley
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The solution of the important substantive questions presented in this case has been complicated by the unexplained and unsatisfactory state of the record. Throughout these proceedings the only one of the twelve individuals named as defendants who has apparently taken any action has been the defendant Clement O. Miniger. He alone filed a demurrer to the original and amended petitions in the Court of Common Pleas, and he alone appealed from the decision of the Court of Appeals to this court. The parties and the courts below, however, seem to have treated the case as though the rights of all the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Spalding v. VilasSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Andrews v. . GardinerNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Den Norske Ameriekalinje Actiesselskabet v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Mellon v. BrewerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927
- Rice v. CoolidgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Yeager v. Local Union 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Surace v. WuligerOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- McNayr v. KellySupreme Court of Florida · 1966
- Advanced Training Systems Inc. v. Caswell Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- M.J. DiCorpo, Inc. v. SweeneyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.