Legal Opinion

M.J. DiCorpo, Inc. v. Sweeney

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1994No. 93-186PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

Appellants appeal, urging that the alleged oral “Compensation Agreement” is unenforceable as a matter of law and that, therefore, the court of appeals erred in finding that summary judgment was improper on appellees’ claims for breach of contract. Appellees cross-appeal from the judgment of the court of appeals which affirmed the trial court’s decision granting summary judgment on the claims set forth in the supplemental complaint. Given the procedural posture of this case, all relevant evidence must be viewed in a light most favorable to appellees who opposed the motions for summary judgment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Yeager v. Local Union 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Surace v. WuligerOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Hecht v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Normandy Place Associates v. BeyerOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Bigelow v. BrumleyOhio Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Welling v. WeinfeldOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Ferreri v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Fisher v. AhmedOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Bosley v. WildWett. ComDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
  5. George G. Ventura v. The Cincinnati Enquirer Gannett Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API