Legal Opinion

Spalding v. Vilas

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 2, 1896No. 81PublishedCited by 484 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan

This writ of error brings up for review a judgment of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia in general term, which affirmed a final order in the same.court in special term, sustaining a demurrer to the declaration filed by the plaintiff in error Spalding against- the defendant Tilas, and dismissing the plaintiff’s action.

The question presented for determination is whether the plaintiff’s declaration stated a valid cause of action against the defendant.

The plaintiff alleged that he was a citizen of the District of Columbia, and had been for more than twenty years an attorney-at-law,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Randall v. BrighamSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Yates v. LansingNew York Supreme Court · 1810

3Cited by484 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

479 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API