People v. Reed
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
The defendant George H. Harlan has appealed from the amended judgment, from the order *260permitting tbe amendment to tbe judgment and from an order refusing to dismiss tbe action.
For some time prior to tbe commencement of tbe action tbe defendant and bis wife were tbe owners of a parcel of land containing twenty acres, wbicb was located on tbe border of Richardson Bay in Marin County. Through the division of highways of tbe department of public works the plaintiff planned tbe construction of a cut-off as a part of tbe Redwood highway. The cut-off was laid out on a line extending north and south…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Takekawa v. HoleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- County of Siskiyou v. GamlichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1916
- Forrester v. LawlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Strehlow v. MothornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Burnquist v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- People Ex Rel. Dep't of Pub. Works v. Di TomasoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Burnquist v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945