Legal Opinion
People Ex Rel. Dep't of Pub. Works v. Di Tomaso
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 27, 1967No. Civ. 22770PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSims, J.
The state, as condemnor, has appealed from a judgment which awarded the defendant property owners $55,000. This judgment ensued from a jury trial which resulted in a verdict that the fair market value of the property taken was $35,000, that the owners suffered $20,000 damages to the remainder of their property by reason of the severance and the construction of the improvement in the manner proposed, and that there were no special benefits accruing to the remainder of the property by reason of such construction.
The gravamen of the condemnor’s complaint is that the owners, despite objections…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. California Fish Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Breidert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. YukiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. TaylorColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- Miro v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District v. HalmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.