Forrester v. Lawler
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County granting a motion to amend a judgment. W. P. James, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an appeal from an order granting a motion to amend a judgment theretofore rendered and entered.
Upon a hearing had on February 28, 1908, of defendant’s motion to dismiss the action for want of prosecution the court, as disclosed by the minute entry of the clerk, ordered the cause dismissed without prejudice. Thereafter, on August 26, 1908, the court rendered judgment wherein it was recited that the dismissal was by consent of parties and omitted to state that such dismissal was without prejudice. This judg ment was signed by the judge of the court and duly entered by the clerk on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kaufman v. ShainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Egan v. EganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- City and County of San Francisco v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Brackett v. BanegasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Jacks v. BaldezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McKannay v. McKannayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Felton Chemical Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Rogers v. Springfield Fire & Marine InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- E. Clemens Horst Co. v. Federal Mutual Liability InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Union Bank & Trust Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.